Letter+from+Cheche+on+Zuma+rape+trial

=Letter from Cheche on Zuma rape trial=

Hi my comrade, if you still one, you saying in your views on the Zuma saga in response to Raymond Suttner's letter: 'In the case of a conviction, the SACP collectively will accept it. That is the inevitable corollary of the Party’s stated position of “innocent until proven guilty”.'

You do not have any guarantee that the party shall accept the conviction of the comrade and you not the party spokesperson to express this confused view. As to whether the party shall accept the conviction that is a highly debatable matter. Do not imposed your views as if you a party spokeperson on this issue. Sorry just shut-up and not smuggle your own confused views on the matter.

In fact you sound like one who will accept the Zuma conviction. And you better express your views as such and not speak as if you mandated to do so on behalf of the party on this matter. Sorry do not dare do that.

You go on say: 'In the case of an acquittal, the Party’s caution will have been vindicated. But what will individuals like Suttner do? Are they going to go up against the legal system as a whole?'

In fact you seem not to understand the broad issues sorrounding this very saga and crime in general. Who said the party shall "collectively accept" cde JZ conviction. The party shall "collectively accept the conviction" of JZ by whom? In who's interests? Under what conditions and system?

Severally maybe the party might accept the conviction and not collectively, sorry you wrong. Where do you get what you saying Dominic? You not the spokesperson of the party and so should stop interpreting and speaking on its behalf without even consulting anyone inside it. You definately confused.

At best you sound worse that the comrade you trying to critisice. Saying innocent until proven guilty does not neccessarily translates to accepting the imprisonment of the comrade by the system that is still capitalist an racist in orientation.

You do not have the grasp of the real matters here. In fact you sound just like, if not greater than the very Suttner you trying to criticise. I am sorry you confused and do not have enough to tell you where you should go.

I am sorry I differ with you fundamentally.

cheche selepe**
 * regards

395 words